Posted by & filed under Video.

An ambitious new TPE Theory series launches today with Daryl "aaaaaaaaa" Jace taking us DEEP into hand history review techniques. In this 5 part series Daryl spends up to an hour on each hand giving you an incredible depth of analysis on how to review your own hands and think about poker. This is a TPE staff favorite series and an instant classic. Warning: this is for intermediate to advanced players, as the analysis gets very refined at times. We kick the series off with instructions on how to do the analysis, and the remaining 4 parts focus on specific hands.

Sorry, you do not have access to this content.

If you are already a member, please click here to login
VN:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
Rating: 9.5/10 (11 votes cast)
TPE Theory: Expert Level Hand History Analysis (Part 3), 9.5 out of 10 based on 11 ratings

MORE IN THIS SERIES: Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 4 | Part 5

This video requires the Adobe Flash player, please click here to download the player

5 Comments

  • At 2012.08.14 18:51, MartinAltman said:

    Hi Daryl! I’m not happy with the result of this hand because I would have bet/folded this flop because of his stack, us being utg, call being too high variance etc., but I still wanna thank you for making these vids, it’s really helping me to think about every single possible way to play a hand. Keep it up!

    VN:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    • At 2012.08.14 18:52, FloppedBackdoorTrips said:

      Just an awesome series, thanks for doing this. Questions:

      When wrapping up decision to CB, you say that you have the BDFD which is always good. Just to clarify, in this spot the 7h its way more valuable as a blocker to combo draws that are c/r’ing than it is for making the flush and/or bluffing later streets, correct?

      How much do you factor in a healthy-ish/shorter stack c/r’ing into a big stack? Against a random, shouldn’t this be stronger, in general?

      Can’t a jam on flop be a weird sort of range merge, where he’s calling w/flush draws but folding 9x, TT, JJ, or is that way too optimistic? Like you said, it just seems like we’re never 3B bluffing in this spot.

      VN:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
      Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
      • At 2012.08.15 01:20, duggs said:

        on the river with his value range, 35 makes sense doesnt it?

        great series

        VN:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
        Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
        • At 2012.08.16 12:50, FloppedBackdoorTrips said:

          Yeah I thought 53 and 22 both made sense, although 53 might not be in his range pre

          VN:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
          Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
        • At 2012.08.16 13:45, aaaaaaaaa said:

          The replayer on here isnt working for me at the moment so I cant answer any of the questions. Also if you remember what time in the video I should go to let me know. If u dont I can just find it myself.

          VN:R_U [1.9.22_1171]
          Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

          You must be logged in to post a comment.