TPE Theory: Getting Off on the Right Foot with Andrew Brokos (Part 5)
[Total: 38 Average: 4.8/5]
You must sign in to vote
MORE IN THIS SERIES : Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4
TPE Theory: Getting Off on the Right Foot with Andrew Brokos (Part 5)
MORE IN THIS SERIES : Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4
Arsenal1
Great series yet again
bartzpokerstar
Very helpful stuff
MajorAlma
Thank you
Gunz4Hire
great series thanks
SKAHfish
Great series thanks. Keep up the good work. So funny I was about to suggest this go on the getting started section on the University then noticed it was already there. 🙂
hayatekirino
Hello all, i am new at this kind of forum-training sites and i really enjoy my first 5 videos .i would like to ask where i can post some work just to see if i understand what you say on this videos; its food for thought especially the concept should i check/call or should i check/raise post flop.
Shobettor
This series turned on a light bulb with my thinking and how math is indeed important but not as complicated as one may think concerning the math aspect. Great presentation AB!
Iamscottro
Outstanding series! This is exactly what I was looking for to take my game out of 2003. At 50, the game has completely passed me by in terms of advances in strategy and theory. I’ve got 40 obsolete poker books on my bookshelf. So glad I’m finally doing something about it. It’s never too late to learn. Thanks Andrew!
LasV3gas
This is exactly why I joined TPE. Consider me woken up. Time to train the brain to think in EV. Time to purge the ‘go with the gut instinct’ approach and start expanding my calling/raising range to marginal hands while thinking EV.
crisatunity1
Thanks Andrew, these 5 videos have been great. I definitely need to work on my math and theory side so will purchase the books you mention. Starting to think of poker in a different light after these videos, I’ll look to slowly improve in future hopefully. (within my bankroll of course!)
M4aximillion
Great series even for more experienced poker players. A good book for further study of the mental game and risk/loss aversion would be The Mental Game of Poker. Kinda suprised it was not recommended at the end? The best poker book i ever read. It also comes as an audio book on audible.
RaisersEdge
Andrew you have done a lovely job of tying this series up with your final episode! You have consistently covered MUCH of the SAME material (which is a good thing, a NECESSARY thing), but have done so by varying your examples and explanations both verbally and using visual aids. It’s ALL about the FOUNDATIONS as I said in a previous comment and this is a wonderful intro to the University course as well as for ANYONE who wants to raise their level of play. I think way too many players are afraid to admit they admit that a large portion of their decisions are based on well… their “gut”. Like it or not to become a better player we all MUST reacquaint ourselves with MATH. And for many the last time they actually studied math seriously (if ever, and that is OK) was a VERY LONG TIME AGO! It’s scary, but it’s for the most part basic Algebra. Thank YOU for putting this series together and tying rote concepts and repetition (which are the basics of a players tool box), as well as simplifying the explanations of what could otherwise be “scary” subjects for many players in a flawless manner. I would like to coach soon. I have seen trainers on most if not ALL the sites out there. And you my friend seem to really enjoy what your doing and your doing it in an excellent fashion! Thank YOU and thank TPE!
IAmTheDisco
Thank you very much for this series. Especially enjoyed the first half of this last video as it opened my thought process for finding certain types of semi-bluff/bluff hands which I could add to my value ranges, both for calling and raising. How do determine how many semi-/pure-bluffing hands you want to add to your value range in any given hand? Are you using a roughly estimated or fixed %-relationship of value to bluff or is it a flexible number?
tmelander
Thank you, Andrew!
Pattias
Appreciate the content Andrew. I’m about to apply this for the first time.
Telau
Very instructive videos, thanks Andrew!
settecba
Great series Andrew! Thanks! When you were talking about the 65 vs 99 I actually paused the video and found 2 reasons 65 is better. You mentioned the first one in the video. The second one is that 99 blocks villain´s bluffing range and makes it more value heavy, leaving us in worse shape calling with 99 than 56.
edumedeiroscwb
very good!!! thanks a lot!