<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Tournament Poker Edge &#124; Learn Poker Strategy &#124; Tournament Poker Training from the Pros - Topic: PIO Hand 2</title>
	<link>https://www.tournamentpokeredge.com/forum/gto-forum/pio-hand-2/</link>
	<description><![CDATA[Professional MTT training from the top live and online pros]]></description>
	<generator>Simple:Press Version 5.7.5.3</generator>
	<atom:link href="https://www.tournamentpokeredge.com/forum/gto-forum/pio-hand-2/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <item>
        	<title>3for3 on PIO Hand 2</title>
        	<link>https://www.tournamentpokeredge.com/forum/gto-forum/pio-hand-2/#p74768</link>
        	<category>GTO Forum</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.tournamentpokeredge.com/forum/gto-forum/pio-hand-2/#p74768</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>I am going to replay the hand without PIO comments first, then show what PIO thinks about all of the ranges for various actions.</p>
<p>I open ATcc UTG at 8-16 to 4K.  Effective stacks are about 80K. Cutoff calls.</p>
<p>Flop is QsJs8c, giving me back door clubs and a double gut shot.  With a board this dynamic, and one that does not necessarily favor my range, I opt to check.  Villain bets 4K, and I call.</p>
<p>Turn is 7s, we both check.</p>
<p>River is 8s, putting a 4 flush and pair on board.  I bet pot on the river Villain tank called with red 66.</p>
<p>I have myself opening about 14% of hands (Importantly for this, ATo is in my range, but KTo is not).  Villain calling about 15% of hands, obviously does not have many combos of the big pairs but I did give him some small percentage of those as well.  His range has more of the lower suited connectors and Q9s type of hands.</p>
<p>PIO thinks I should check 63% of hands and bet 37% ( I gave it 2/3 pot sized bet).  Intuitively this seems like a very bad board to bet in general, I am sure I would check more than it does.  It likes to bet AA and KK most.  It does not bet AKss but does bet most AK without a flush draw about 2/3 of the time.</p>
<p>Villain bets about 1/2 of the time.  Interestingly, it 'never' bets 77 but mostly bets 33.</p>
<p>In response to the bet, we only check raise about 7% of the time, mostly with sets and some ATo, preferably with a spade.</p>
<p> The 7S turn, we check about 86% of the time.  Villain bets 1/2 of the time.  His bluffs are curious to me, mostly small pocket pairs with no spades. PIO thinks Villain should keep bluffing with his actual hand, 66 no spade for example.  </p>
<p>The river is where I thought this was interesting.  I obviously have one of the worst hands I can get here with.  This, and my KTs without a spade.  PIO wants me to bluff all of those hands.  I gave it 3 river bet sizes; pot, 1.5 pot, and all in which is about 5x pot.  It split almost evenly between  the two sizes.  It slightly preferred the bigger bet size.</p>
<p>PIO never calls with his actual hand on the river.  It prefers calling with 66 with a spade (duh!).  The only non spade bluff catches are Qx hands.</p>
<p>Villain actually took a picture(!) of his great bluff catch.  He then went over to tell a friend about it.  He was talking in chinese, I assume, but kept saying AK.  I guess he thought AK was a large part of my range, and thus had odds to call.  </p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2019 11:58:01 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
</channel>
</rss>