<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Tournament Poker Edge &#124; Learn Poker Strategy &#124; Tournament Poker Training from the Pros - Topic: Any chance of a "timebomb" video/series?</title>
	<link>https://www.tournamentpokeredge.com/forum/video-discussions/any-chance-of-a-timebomb-videoseries/</link>
	<description><![CDATA[Professional MTT training from the top live and online pros]]></description>
	<generator>Simple:Press Version 5.7.5.3</generator>
	<atom:link href="https://www.tournamentpokeredge.com/forum/video-discussions/any-chance-of-a-timebomb-videoseries/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <item>
        	<title>MovieFX on Any chance of a "timebomb" video/series?</title>
        	<link>https://www.tournamentpokeredge.com/forum/video-discussions/any-chance-of-a-timebomb-videoseries/#p69054</link>
        	<category>Video Discussions</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.tournamentpokeredge.com/forum/video-discussions/any-chance-of-a-timebomb-videoseries/#p69054</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Just to follow-up and prove a point. I went 6-0 playing some MTT SnG super-KO hypers yesterday. I only scored a single KO across all of these and busted the first hand in most. The variance is super high. I was happy with every decision I made, I just didn't win the flips, or I won the first without a KO and ended up busting.</p>
<p>I've noticed the new STT Hypers start with the same 500 chip stack but have a few more levels (level 1 is 10/20 instead of 25/50 for example) so play starts with around 25BB. These may be better for practicing push-fold as they provide a little more opportunity for a skill-edge to make a difference...more play.</p>
<p>My final thought is that I need to ensure I'm risking a very small percentage of my bankroll on hypers to counter the variance. If I wanted to specialize in them I might make the volume needed to see a steady positive ROI (still playing with a smaller ABI), but with the small sample size I actually play I don't think I can consider them a part of my on-going schedule. They feel too much like gambling to me. Not my style. I'm thinking I should be playing at something like 400 ABI of my bank roll compared to the 100 ABI I use for MTTs and normal speed SnGs (I take a higher than average risk because I'm still playing low enough stakes that I can deposit if I need to).</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2016 12:31:07 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>MovieFX on Any chance of a "timebomb" video/series?</title>
        	<link>https://www.tournamentpokeredge.com/forum/video-discussions/any-chance-of-a-timebomb-videoseries/#p69008</link>
        	<category>Video Discussions</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.tournamentpokeredge.com/forum/video-discussions/any-chance-of-a-timebomb-videoseries/#p69008</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>I agree. Not much different than a Hyper mixed with a satellite at the end. I've played a couple, 2nd in one and would have been 5th a couple of days ago but my power went out and when it came back on I was holding AJs in MP and just shoved. I didn't notice it was the last hand. Got called by K3o and V hit a K. No need to risk there. Cashed for just 1.5x buy-in.</p>
<p>If I'm going to play Hypers I prefer the new 6-max Super-KO SnG with 24-36 seats. It only takes 2 KOs to break even. I played a series of them last night and out of maybe 7 tourneys I made 1st, 2nd, 4th (bubble) and got 1-2 KOs in all but maybe 2. In my 1st place run I think I scored 9 KOs and often got ~4-5.</p>
<p>These play really fast and are push-fold from the first hand, but I think it is great practice for this aspect of play. Interesting spots still come up. In one I had a big chip lead and the table suddenly went tight so I just started min-raising every pair, Qx, Kx and Ax hand and picked up a bunch of chips. Still, there <em>is</em> a skill-edge in picking spots.</p>
<p>Don't get me wrong. It definitely takes some run-good. I could have easily gone 0-8 by losing the first race in each. The variance can be high. In fact there was one where I blinded down to ~300 chips from 500, picked up AA and got all in against another AA, then went card dead again and lost a random race. </p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 18:56:50 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>rabbhit on Any chance of a "timebomb" video/series?</title>
        	<link>https://www.tournamentpokeredge.com/forum/video-discussions/any-chance-of-a-timebomb-videoseries/#p68880</link>
        	<category>Video Discussions</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.tournamentpokeredge.com/forum/video-discussions/any-chance-of-a-timebomb-videoseries/#p68880</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>I would advice watching videos focusing on push/fold play and even hyper turbo sng's. The format is crazy in timebomb and I wouldn't play it more then to fill out once in a while if nothing better is available.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 04:58:03 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>Garfieldno on Any chance of a "timebomb" video/series?</title>
        	<link>https://www.tournamentpokeredge.com/forum/video-discussions/any-chance-of-a-timebomb-videoseries/#p68846</link>
        	<category>Video Discussions</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.tournamentpokeredge.com/forum/video-discussions/any-chance-of-a-timebomb-videoseries/#p68846</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>As the title say, I would like to request a video or videoseries on timebomb tournaments on stars,</p>
<p>as it seems this is the new "thing" after the new schedule came up.</p>
<p>If it's possible for someone to do a take on, that would be really appriciated 🙂</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2016 06:55:04 -0400</pubDate>
        </item>
</channel>
</rss>