<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Tournament Poker Edge &#124; Learn Poker Strategy &#124; Tournament Poker Training from the Pros - Topic: Simplified C betting</title>
	<link>https://www.tournamentpokeredge.com/forum/video-discussions/simplified-c-betting/</link>
	<description><![CDATA[Professional MTT training from the top live and online pros]]></description>
	<generator>Simple:Press Version 5.7.5.3</generator>
	<atom:link href="https://www.tournamentpokeredge.com/forum/video-discussions/simplified-c-betting/rss/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <item>
        	<title>RaisersEdge on Simplified C betting</title>
        	<link>https://www.tournamentpokeredge.com/forum/video-discussions/simplified-c-betting/#p74324</link>
        	<category>Video Discussions</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.tournamentpokeredge.com/forum/video-discussions/simplified-c-betting/#p74324</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<blockquote class="spPostEmbedQuote">
<p><strong>3for3 said </strong><br />
Fabulous series. I really learned a lot. For those of you who haven't watched this, put it on the top of your list.  I have some questions:</p>
<p>1.  Can Villains who know we play these strategies exploit them by changing which hands they flat with?  In particular, in position, they 'know' they can see 4 cards if they like.  Does this make speculative hands (set mines, sc's) more or less profitable?  Out of position, they know they are getting even better implied odds, since we are auto betting all but the most dynamic flops.</p>
<p>2. When we have checked the flop, and Villain checks back, what is our 'general' plan on the turn?  You assume most Villains will stab too much (as happened to me the one time I have tried this live).  So, should we be betting our entire range when they check behind?  (Seems like yes, especially if the turn is a blank).</p>
<p>3. What happens when we are in middle position, which seems to happen often.  We raise, late position flats, now BB calls with huge range.  Should we still be checking the flop?  My instincts are yes; the LP has the same range, and now there is another person to contend with.  As against that, the pot is now larger...  </p>
</blockquote>
<p>I actually have been dealing with all of the above QUITE A BIT as of late myself and would love to see some replies from the coaches on this/these topic/s.</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2018 17:45:05 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        <item>
        	<title>3for3 on Simplified C betting</title>
        	<link>https://www.tournamentpokeredge.com/forum/video-discussions/simplified-c-betting/#p74315</link>
        	<category>Video Discussions</category>
        	<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.tournamentpokeredge.com/forum/video-discussions/simplified-c-betting/#p74315</guid>
        	        	<description><![CDATA[<p>Fabulous series. I really learned a lot. For those of you who haven't watched this, put it on the top of your list.  I have some questions:</p>
<p>1.  Can Villains who know we play these strategies exploit them by changing which hands they flat with?  In particular, in position, they 'know' they can see 4 cards if they like.  Does this make speculative hands (set mines, sc's) more or less profitable?  Out of position, they know they are getting even better implied odds, since we are auto betting all but the most dynamic flops.</p>
<p>2. When we have checked the flop, and Villain checks back, what is our 'general' plan on the turn?  You assume most Villains will stab too much (as happened to me the one time I have tried this live).  So, should we be betting our entire range when they check behind?  (Seems like yes, especially if the turn is a blank).</p>
<p>3. What happens when we are in middle position, which seems to happen often.  We raise, late position flats, now BB calls with huge range.  Should we still be checking the flop?  My instincts are yes; the LP has the same range, and now there is another person to contend with.  As against that, the pot is now larger...</p>
]]></description>
        	        	<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2018 20:03:45 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
</channel>
</rss>