[Total: 16 Average: 8.7/5]
You must sign in to vote
MORE IN THIS SERIES : Part 1 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5
TPE Theory: Bluffing with Andrew Brokos (Part 2)
MORE IN THIS SERIES : Part 1 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5
loxxii
25:30 with 87s. When I have back door equity, I am more likely to c-bet and then barrel if I hit a good card. I think this keeps my turn barreling range wide. Should I be delayed c-betting in these spots instead?
Wow great video! If the Q9s and 87o hands are considered modest, then I am definitely not bluffing enough. This may be a quantum leap for my game.
(I’m striving to put right what once went wrong and hoping each time my next leap will be the leap home. Anybody? Maybe it’s just me. I miss the 90s.)
Jon_Allan
Ziggy says the odds are real good.
tazzjazz
man I feel stupid when I watch your vids
TBMeyer42
I am starting to see just how beneficial smart bluffing can be, Even at my low-limit live cash games. Nice job.
EvilJade
Good Video.
In the second example you could include AQs (heart) as a monster hand that would check. It you have the made hand with the nut flush draw you can sometimes slow play but you lose value against another AQ. Without the board pairing you can call, call (bet/check-raise) even if the flush comes but if the board pairs you have a harder decision.