View Plans & Pricing

If you are signed in and are seeing this message, please be sure you have selected a user name in My Profile. The forum requires it.
A A A
Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
sp_TopicIcon
QQ vs min 3bet and 5bet shove
storkman1971
Guest
Guests
1
February 15, 2011 - 5:10 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory
0

Poker Stars $10 No Limit Hold'em Tournament – t300/t600 Blinds + t50 – 9 players

TournamentPokerEdge.com Hand History Converter

BTN: BB = 29.6, t17752

SB: BB = 29.3, t17550

BB: BB = 29.9, t17944

UTG: BB = 4.4, t2623

Hero (UTG+1): BB = 100.7, t60421

UTG+2: BB = 20.7, t12404

MP1: BB = 53.5, t32097

MP2: BB = 24.0, t14380

CO: BB = 59.8, t35860

Pre Flop: (t1350) Hero is UTG+1 with Q of clubs Q of diamonds

1 fold, Hero raises to t1277, 1 fold, MP1 raises to t2400, 5 folds, Hero raises to t6200, MP1 raises to t32047 all in, Hero?

 

MP1 had only been at the table 4 or so hands so no idea. I am 2nd in chips with ~400 left. I am trying not to be results oriented.

1) I thougt the min 3bet then shove looked very strong vs EP raise and 4bet.

2) I think i am needing 40% and if his range to 5bet AI here is ultra tight then I am right on it.

3) Do I just close my eyes and call here or can I fold and stay near the top in chips? IF I call and lose I would still be above avg.

I am constantly finding myself 2nd guessing whether to get it in or fold and saving my very good chip stack. And of course I lose and then I 2nd guess myself for weeks after.

If this is obvious i apologize

bennymacca
Adelaide Australia
Road Gambling with Doyle
Members
Forum Posts: 2616
Member Since:
October 6, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
February 15, 2011 - 6:12 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

interesting spot because you are so deep. 

 

i think the mistake in the hand is your 4bet – if you are going to 4bet, then you pretty much have to get it in imo, which is marginal when you are this deep, as you have correctly pointed out. 

 

otherwise you can flat villains 3bet and play poker from there. obv you are OOP but you could easily check call just about any flop and re-evaluate, and it will cost you the same price as the 4bet, but now you have seen 4 cards to try and narrow down his range. 

 

and it looks strong for you to be flatting a 3bet and calling most flops so i doubt you will get barrelled on the turn, which means you can safely give up if villain fires 2 barells, and probably fire river for value if turn is checked through. 

obviously i am assuming some type of safe board for us but i think you get the idea. 

storkman1971
Guest
Guests
3
February 15, 2011 - 7:14 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

bennymacca said:

interesting spot because you are so deep. 

 

i think the mistake in the hand is your 4bet – if you are going to 4bet, then you pretty much have to get it in imo, which is marginal when you are this deep, as you have correctly pointed out. 

 

otherwise you can flat villains 3bet and play poker from there. obv you are OOP but you could easily check call just about any flop and re-evaluate, and it will cost you the same price as the 4bet, but now you have seen 4 cards to try and narrow down his range. 

 

and it looks strong for you to be flatting a 3bet and calling most flops so i doubt you will get barrelled on the turn, which means you can safely give up if villain fires 2 barells, and probably fire river for value if turn is checked through. 

obviously i am assuming some type of safe board for us but i think you get the idea. 


Thanks for the reply benny,

I thought the 4 bet was bad after as well, in game I just was all wound up to see QQ and tried to induce a 5bet. Which ironically i got and then hated it.

Oh well, learn and on to the next one.

Thanks again

Hagbard Celine
Guest
Guests
4
February 15, 2011 - 9:31 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory
0

i think readless, trying to get QQ in PF for this many BBs from these positions is extremely optimistic and way too thin of an edge (if an edge at all) to push. you have a very nice stack and should be able to find WAY better edges to push than a 0-2% edge where you have to commit half your stack.

 

also, have a plan when you make a bet or a raise. know what you're trying to accomplish. if you 4bet here, it should be to get allin (well, for the most part. with the proper history you can def 4bet/fold).

 

you have the option of calling the 3bet, which will 1) keep the pot smaller and 2) keep villain's range as wide as possible. i mean, his range isn't wide to begin with, but better to keep the possibility of JJ/AQ in there than to 4bet and ensure that his range is QQ+, AK or KK+, AK.

 

as played, you need 38% and even against KK+, AK you have just shy of 40%. maybe he doesn't do this with AK though. i couldn't really fault you for calling or folding.

 

but do learn from this. if you have a strong value hand that you might have to fold if you reopen the betting, then you should maybe consider calling.

myers3m
Guest
Guests
5
February 15, 2011 - 9:48 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

when you guys say ” you need 38%”  what are you talking about? what does 38% represent ?

bennymacca
Adelaide Australia
Road Gambling with Doyle
Members
Forum Posts: 2616
Member Since:
October 6, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
February 15, 2011 - 9:52 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

myers3m said:

when you guys say ” you need 38%”  what are you talking about? what does 38% represent ?


when you input hero's hand into pokerstove and put it up against a range of villain hands (which we estimate), we  have 38% equity vs that range (i.e we win 38% of the time). if you have not used pokerstove before, download it and have a play around (its free and pretty much an essential piece of analysis software)
myers3m
Guest
Guests
7
February 15, 2011 - 10:07 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

thank you thank you

Hagbard Celine
Guest
Guests
8
February 15, 2011 - 11:54 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

no, we have ~40% against a range of KK+, AK (i used pro poker tools, not stove. on a mac.)

 

when i said we need 38% i meant that to breakeven on a call here, our QQ needs to have at least 38% against whatever range we give villain.

 

you get that by doing this equation:

 

100*1/(pot/amt to call)+1

 

in this case:

 

pot: 39597 (1350 blinds+antes, his 32047, our 6200)

amt to call: 25287 (his 32047-6200 we already have in)

 

100*1/(39597/25287)+1

100/1.565+1

100/2.6

38.5%

bennymacca
Adelaide Australia
Road Gambling with Doyle
Members
Forum Posts: 2616
Member Since:
October 6, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
February 16, 2011 - 12:06 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

sorry, i got the equity and pot odds the wrong way round

hawkeyeK9
Guest
Guests
10
February 16, 2011 - 4:10 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

I agree with above. 4bet got you in trouble here, and it will often in this spot. If you just call his 3bet it also disguises your big pair a bit. Then as we were talking in another forum, pot control will be important post flop. As benny stated, we can ck/call the flop and re-evaluate.

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 2780

Currently Online:
10 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

bennymacca: 2616

Foucault: 2067

folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133

praetor: 1033

theginger45: 924

P-aire 146: 832

Turbulence: 768

The Riceman: 731

duggs: 591

florianm1: 588

Newest Members:

GBW198

Johnelwood

Bocheech21

alexalex2015

oneout2many

JLPicard

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 24

Topics: 12705

Posts: 75003

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1063

Members: 11991

Moderators: 2

Admins: 5

Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos

Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1