Sorry, this video is for members only!

To join Tournament Poker Edge and get access to this video, click here.

If you are already a member, click here to sign-in.

$55 Monsoon Win Hand History Review with Arvydas Merfeldas (Part 1)
[Total: 2    Average: 5/5]

MORE IN THIS SERIES : Part 2 | Part 3

Concepts In This Video:

3 Responses to “$55 Monsoon Win Hand History Review with Arvydas Merfeldas (Part 1)”

  1. YoshuaPC

    32:24 why did you opted for the value bet on river of 40%? would it have been better to go all in and try to get all his stack from hands like KJ K10, KQ, Q10, QJ, 88. arent you losing value? or you didnt because it didnt look Asymmetrical to overbet all in. or what was the reason overall of using that sizes?

    • Merfinis

      Hey Yoshua! I’m using this bet sizing mostly for these reasons:
      1) As the player after my missed c-bets is not stabbing at the pot his range will be relatively weak/mid-strength.
      2) On the turn I’m choosing my small sizing to start extracting value from mid-strength hands that might continue so mostly: ATs / QJs / AQs/o maybe JTs if he’s flatting that.
      3) On the river of course, shoving would be nice, but I just think my opponent’s range will be too weak to call, so I rather gain little less, but still extract some value. Also maybe player will opt to go for some crazy bluff with lets say QJs type of hand, there is some room for that.

      Hope that helps 🙂

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.