Merge 100k Major Win Hand History Review with Daryl “aaaaaaaa” Jace (Part 2)
[Total: 20    Average: 9.3/5]

MORE IN THIS SERIES : Part 1 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Part 6

Concepts In This Video:

9 Responses to “Merge 100k Major Win Hand History Review with Daryl “aaaaaaaa” Jace (Part 2)”

  1. kingoflimbs1

    I want to play poker with these guys every day of my life! Really good examples on how to exploit but f**k me these guys play bad! Great series so far Daryl looking forward to the later stages

  2. Tiltmaster21

    @minute36ish you say clandrovers makes a good check on the river with 2pair, Qs and 5s. How could that be? I mean, he isnt folding to a shove, isnt inducing vs missed draw.. He just loses value vs and Ax. Or am I wrong? Imrahil i think could have an ace. Bwis limped in and I dont think imrahil isnt good enough to even consider Isopushing with Ax on the cutoff..

    And also wondering about the last hand when you bet 2.5k into 10k with 3k left. I agree thats the best best vs his range when you hold the nuts.. but doesnt it just look nutty? are you making the same bet w KT or T9 yourself? I mean It seams so hard to balance it.. You are talking about the low-variance play all the time. If you only had Qx and not a boat on the turn, dont you just wanna pick up the pot of 10k and move on? Instead of making 2.5k extra in chips when he calls with a draw and misses, but you are out of the tournament of he hits..?

    Just some thoughts. Anyway, really enjoying your videos and your deep-level thinking. You are obv a far far better player then I thought after the way you played those ducks in the WSOP Main event. Can you by the way explain what happend in that hand?

    Keep up the good work! peace out

  3. black666

    love your vids and your analysis. I also like how you comment on game flow and discuss other people’s mistakes even if you weren’t in the hand yourself.

    it’s amazing to see how the quality of tpe improved in the last couple of months and the addition of some great pros.

  4. aaaaaaaaa

    You’re 100% right regarding the 1st hand u mentioned. We aren’t folding to a shove or inducing bluffs so we should just bet ourselves my bad. As for hand 2 it looks super nutty to someone competent but i just dont give ppl credit for thinking in this tournament. vs any1 good u should def just shove.

  5. noqster

    wow is the quality of play in a $100? tournament on merge generally so bad? Looks like a 5$ on stars or was this an exception?

  6. Heartland2013

    The A6o hand at 37:02 doesnt really even seem close from cEV perspective. You have to jam your whole stack obviously and ICMIZER says 55+, ATo, A9s, KJs+.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.