View Plans & Pricing

If you are signed in and are seeing this message, please be sure you have selected a user name in My Profile. The forum requires it.
A A A
Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
sp_TopicIcon
KK after the flop...what would you do?
tjpete96
Flounder
Members
Forum Posts: 7
Member Since:
June 7, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
July 16, 2014 - 3:22 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Playing live at a $1/$2 NL. Table just opened up and is about 3 hands in. No reads on anyone…I only recognize one other player but I have not played live in a few months. I only bought in for $110 & won the pot prior without showdown. I now have $120. I am in MP with KK. One limper and I raise to $13. Villain with a $200 stack immediately on my left calls and so do both blinds and the EP limper.

We see the flop 5-handed and it is 3-4-5 rainbow. EP checks and I bet $40 into a pot of $65. Leaving me about $70 left. Villian on my left pops another $100 on top putting me all in. Everyone folds to me.

Am I ahead or behind? Call all in my remaining $70 or fold? This is my first post. I do well in tourneys live and on line but suck at cash for both. Just looking to see if I made the right decision.

michae1di11on
Midstakes Master
Members
Forum Posts: 137
Member Since:
April 16, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
July 16, 2014 - 5:23 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

I think if the quick math I did is correct you have to call 70 to win 285 altogether? You only need 24% equity to call here. He will have a set sometimes but he may have JJ or QQ. It's quite high variance to play cash games with less than 100bb for this reason – once you make a hand and bet, your getting a great price to call when someone raises for the rest of your chips. 

 

I don't know much about playing live but on the pot odds  alone, I don't know if you can fold here, surely your correct more than 1 in 4 times.

Foucault

TPE Pro
Members
Forum Posts: 2067
Member Since:
December 6, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
July 16, 2014 - 9:41 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

michae1di11on said:

I think if the quick math I did is correct you have to call 70 to win 285 altogether? You only need 24% equity to call here. He will have a set sometimes but he may have JJ or QQ. It's quite high variance to play cash games with less than 100bb for this reason – once you make a hand and bet, your getting a great price to call when someone raises for the rest of your chips. 

Can't say that I agree with this. I guess technically folding away your equity in the pot is variance-free in that it just results in a line going straight down. But getting to make +EV calls is pretty clearly preferable to folding and losing the pot 100% of the time.

Foucault

TPE Pro
Members
Forum Posts: 2067
Member Since:
December 6, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
July 16, 2014 - 9:45 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Have you ever used an equity calculator before? You should practice putting your opponent on a range and calculating how much equity you have against that range and how much you need to call. It's not a matter of “Am I ahead or behind”, of course he will play some hands better than KK like this but that doesn't mean you should fold because he will also play plenty of worse hands like this. You have to learn to estimate how you are doing against all of the hands he could play this way, and that requires doing some homework away from the tables. FWIW this is a very clear call.

michae1di11on
Midstakes Master
Members
Forum Posts: 137
Member Since:
April 16, 2013
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
July 17, 2014 - 10:57 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Foucault said:

michae1di11on said:

I think if the quick math I did is correct you have to call 70 to win 285 altogether? You only need 24% equity to call here. He will have a set sometimes but he may have JJ or QQ. It's quite high variance to play cash games with less than 100bb for this reason – once you make a hand and bet, your getting a great price to call when someone raises for the rest of your chips. 

Can't say that I agree with this. I guess technically folding away your equity in the pot is variance-free in that it just results in a line going straight down. But getting to make +EV calls is pretty clearly preferable to folding and losing the pot 100% of the time.

Do you not think that buying into cash games with 55bb results in higher variance plays than 100bb? I'm not saying he should fold. I just think if he opens for 55bb and cbets into 5 people, once he gets raised, he'll have over 1/3 of his chips in the pot and it will be difficult to play pots that don't involve getting all in very often. FWIW I didn't say he should fold.

Foucault

TPE Pro
Members
Forum Posts: 2067
Member Since:
December 6, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
July 17, 2014 - 2:03 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

I understand that, you're saying that there are hands that you have to fold when you are deeper but that you can get all in with when you are shallower. That's true, and essentially what's happening there is that you are getting leveraged out of the pot. Although you'd have a +EV call if you could get all in, your hand will play poorly against future betting and consequently you have to fold. You're getting forced off of your equity, it's not a good thing and it definitely does not make you less likely to experience losses because you are deep-stacked.

 

I'm not sure there's a necessary relationship between variance and stack depth, but most likely deeper stacks = more variance because there are more decisions to make, and every one of those decisions has variance attached to it, and the biggest decisions/pots are of course bigger than they are when you have less money on the table.

tjpete96
Flounder
Members
Forum Posts: 7
Member Since:
June 7, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
July 18, 2014 - 5:33 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Thank you both for your thoughts. I am aware of equity calculators but have not done much with them. Do you recommend any one in particular? Preferably free. I do agree that being short stack didn’t help…unfortunately I was stuck and that was the last of the cash I brought with me. Normally I would buy in at 100 BB.

SIGABA
California
High Stakes Shark
Members
Forum Posts: 201
Member Since:
January 20, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
July 20, 2014 - 3:14 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Yeah this is a call.  I think a lot of opponents would do this w/ 66-AA, 56, A6.  He could very well have A2 or a set or like 45, but you are beating sooo much of his range you have to call.

 

As far as equity calculators that are free:

PokerStove

PokerStrategy.com – Equilab

 

I like pokerstove the best but they both do the same thing.

tjpete96
Flounder
Members
Forum Posts: 7
Member Since:
June 7, 2014
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
July 23, 2014 - 11:21 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Thanks to all again. By the way, he had 34s and I lost. Was rather tilted that he would call a $12 raise with only the blinds, one limper and 4 left to act.  Oh well.

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 2780

Currently Online:
9 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

bennymacca: 2616

Foucault: 2067

folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133

praetor: 1033

theginger45: 924

P-aire 146: 832

Turbulence: 768

The Riceman: 731

duggs: 591

florianm1: 588

Newest Members:

Johnelwood

Bocheech21

alexalex2015

oneout2many

JLPicard

Jackarmi

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 24

Topics: 12705

Posts: 75003

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1063

Members: 11990

Moderators: 2

Admins: 5

Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos

Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1