This hand is in a $60 7.5k gtd deep-stacked (5k starting stack) on Merge Network. I don't have the HH for this hand because my HUD is not working properly at the moment. ith that said, I am very confident that I remembered all of the streets and sizings correctly. It is early in the tournament and I was multitabling at the time so I am virtually readless besides HUD stats. Both I and villain had roughly the 5k starting stack to start the hand. It is t60 and Hero is dealth 88 on the button. 

Preflop: fold, fold, fold, fold, fold, CO raises to 120, Hero calls 120, fold, fold. 

(330) Flop: Td Ts 9d

CO checks, Hero checks.

(330) Turn: 8d

CO checks, Hero bets 220, CO raises to 440, Hero calls 440.

(1210) River: Jd

CO bets 907, Hero???

CO's preflop range is most likely wide considering he is in LP and opened for the minimum. It is fairly standard to 2.5-3x at this level so even though we are readless about his usual opening sizing, I think it is safe to assume that to some extent CO's range is weaker than if he were to 3x. Looking back on the hand I think 3betting is the most optimal play considering my assumptions about his opening range. I tend to play pre-ante deep-stacked MTTs like cash games and I would certainly 3b for value in a cash game. I would make it slightly larger than normal to offer him worse odds because he min-raised and we are fairly deep. 365 seems like the perfect number for me. In game I flat called with the intention of continuing on most flop textures that contain only one overcard. I think I most likely have the best hand and I am not set-mining from these positions. 

I expect a random viallain to continuation bet this flop with almost his entire range because it is a paired board, even though it is connected and two toned. Once he checks flop I think we can discount many hands from his range. Those hands include overpairs, lone Tx, 9x, and stong draws such as QJ and diamonds. I think betting flop when checked to is optimal because we take the initiative and all overcards and 9s are bad turn cards. We can realistically get value from ace highs, all broadway cards, and underpairs. In game I decided to check and peel a turn card IP. 

We turn gin. Not only do we have a full house, but it likely gives villain a straight and/or flushdraw while drawing dead or close to it. He checks once more and I bet 2/3 pot to build a pot with what is almost always the best hand. Villain check raises min and I call. I am fairly confused what villain's range is on the turn. He is representing a straight, flush, or full house, but my hand is way too strong to fold. I think calling is infinitely better than raising and folding. I would appreciate speculation on what villain both checks flop and then check raises turn. 

The Jd is the most interesting river card in the deck because it completes four cards to a straight flush. We are now losing to the Qd and the 7d, as well as JJ, TT, 99, JT, T9, and T8. I think that we can exclude JJ and JT because they most certainly leads at least the flop or turn. T8 should be discounted because it did not bet the flop, but could certainly check raise the turn after filling up. TT, 99, and T9 are the ideal hands to slowplay from the flop. I don't think any of those combos should be discounted. The Qd is certainly in his turn check raising range as a semibluff and in several value hands. I think we can discount the 7d because I don't think he check raises any hands that contain the 7d on the turn. 

So far villain has played fairly fishy by min-raising preflop, not continuation betting a fairly wet flop, and then check raising minimum on a incredibly wet board on the turn. If my assumption is correct then I am not sure he value bets worse than 88 on the river. Do you think he value bets the Ad or Kd on the river? Then again, I am not entirely sure villain ends up on the river with the Ad or Kd. If he is unlikely to value bet worse on the river, how often does he show up with a hand that needs to bluff? I have a hard time coming up hands that villain decides to take this line as a bluff. Most of the hands that would need to bluff would either bet flop or turn rather than check flop and check raise turn. If those assumptions are true, and they might all be completely false given that we have no previous knowledge of villain, that turns our eights-full into a bluffcatcher. Do you think we are getting the right price to call on the river vs his range?

If we are not getting the right price to bluffcatch, could bluff raising this river be more protitable than calling or folding. We would be representing the Qd or 7d. We would fold out all of his bluffs and we might get him to fold a full house or quads to a big enough river raise. I am not hesitant whatsoever to make a big bluff early in a tournament if I think it is +EV enough. It certainly would be a creative play. If we bluff raise, how much would we need to get him to fold his full houses? Would he fold quads to a river shove?

I am posting this hand to look for advice on how others would play every street. Feel free to focus on streets other than the river. Could 3b folding turn be proftiable? Do you think 3betting preflop is standard BU vs CO? Do you bet this flop when checked to? Do you snap call river or hero fold? 

TL;DR: Hero ends up with the lowest full house on the river facing a bet on a four to a straightflush board. Call, fold, or raise?