View Plans & Pricing

If you are signed in and are seeing this message, please be sure you have selected a user name in My Profile. The forum requires it.
A A A
Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
sp_TopicIcon
On the bubble with JJ
sminnick
Flounder
Members
Forum Posts: 7
Member Since:
June 3, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
January 3, 2013 - 7:14 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

So just wanted to pose this question, I guess it really depends on how much the min cash means to someone.  I can't find the hand history of this hand.  But I was on the bubble, had 16 bb, there was a guy who had less then 1 bb.  UTG raised it 3x the bb, he had 30 bb's, I had 16 bb in middle position.  He wasn't running that aggressively.

 

So obviously the standard play is to just 3bet shove jacks all day long with 16 bigs, so just wondering if that is what most people still would do considering that one guy with less then 1 bb was all but out?  Just curious on other people's play in that situation. 

thedonator716
Guest
Guests
2
January 3, 2013 - 7:21 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Like you said, it depends on what the min cash means to you but unless you can put villain on an extemely narrow range you need to be shoving here. You're not going to make money min cashing tournaments. Personally I am always shoving here. If you were at the FT and big money jumps were involed it would be a tougher decision.

Nqon
High Stakes Shark
Members
Forum Posts: 198
Member Since:
November 30, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
January 3, 2013 - 7:48 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Yeah, unless you somehow satelited into the Big One for One drop and that's the bubble we're talking about this is a shove.

Check out my "going pro" poker journal, updated weekly with wins, losses and my progress as a player:

Click here

semo7172
Flounder
Members
Forum Posts: 9
Member Since:
November 29, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
January 4, 2013 - 2:15 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

I entirely agree with thedonator716

 

That happened to me last night, not jacks but kings,

5.1 hyper, final table bubble, I am 5/10 with 14 bb (very good value for hyper) sitting BB with KK's….CO, who is chip leader, shoved….What would you do….

this is really tough decision….

(finally called, he had A9o and busted cool….. But with jacks never called…..)

Avatar
Carlos
Atlanta, Ga
Member Moderator
Forum Posts: 778
Member Since:
October 21, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
January 4, 2013 - 9:45 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

I dont mind a fold. If he has less than 1 bb, your ICM tax is through the roof and JJ is not a lock to win vs a full 3x from UTG. It is however, doing very good against his range if he is just owning the bubble. Im guessing you would be 60-70% to win? Which is why a shove is standard.

On the flip side, that means you're 30-40% to lose a virtually guaranteed cash barring some miracle for the shorty.

I have no problem with being aggressive here for a decent chance to win.
I have no problem with being passive here for an excellent chance to cash and a marginal chance to win later.

I personally could not blame any one for going either way.

Turbulence
Falkirk, Scotland
Showing Marc Alioto How Its Done
Members
Forum Posts: 768
Member Since:
July 7, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
January 4, 2013 - 12:56 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

no right or wrong answer here, think you have to go with your gut feel at the time. As you still have FE I probably shove here 90+% of the time, only folding really if opener is a super NIT eg 6/5 type stats (decent sample). My thought process is 2 fold 1) how would I play this hand and stack 20 places before min cash and 20 places post min cash, so why should I play it differently now? 2) I tend to err on the side of aggression in 50/50 spots as I am playing for the win.

 

That said, without FE say under 13bbs then I probably fold an take the min cash, then go from there.

aka Prophead340 aka Prophead2000 aka Turbulence_1

PocketFives Profile: .....urbulence/

Nqon
High Stakes Shark
Members
Forum Posts: 198
Member Since:
November 30, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
7
January 4, 2013 - 1:00 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

I think we have to take this spot, only exception is if entery fee is extreeme above your average buy-in (type 20x your average buy in, lets say your average buy-in is 10dollars and you satalited into the sunday million).

Check out my "going pro" poker journal, updated weekly with wins, losses and my progress as a player:

Click here

duggs
nz
Playing The Prelims
Members
Forum Posts: 591
Member Since:
May 30, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
8
January 4, 2013 - 7:14 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

I dont understand skipping a spot like this, we dont bust that often, most of the time he folds, and even when called we are doing fine, also folding ITM with 17bb is far from ideal as we arent giving ourselves much of a stack to work with post bubble

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 2780

Currently Online:
27 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

bennymacca: 2616

Foucault: 2067

folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133

praetor: 1033

theginger45: 924

P-aire 146: 832

Turbulence: 768

The Riceman: 731

duggs: 591

florianm1: 588

Newest Members:

Bocheech21

alexalex2015

oneout2many

JLPicard

Jackarmi

WSOPstar2B

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 24

Topics: 12705

Posts: 75003

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1063

Members: 11989

Moderators: 2

Admins: 5

Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos

Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1