my roommate (destiniunbound from my first video) has been grinding these with good results. pretty sure he’s made ~5FTs or something.

i’ve been out of town, so haven’t really talked with him about his strategy or how the tourneys are structured. i play a decent amount of ring game rush poker and my approach is to 4-table and just play solid ABC poker and do it as much for the rakeback as anything else (~$30/hour 4tabling at 200NL full ring). i find that the lack of reads/history combined with my desire to get in as many hands as possible for the rakeback make the very straightforward approach the best.

however, in a tournament, especially as you get down to fewer and fewer players and you begin to actually have history with other players that the strategy begins to be the same as a regular tournament?

i’m not sure, but i’m going to start looking to mix these into my schedule and see how they play and check back with this thead after.

crazy i have tryed the rush cash games and they are fast and you can see alot of hands. although in a turbo tourney playing abc poker i wonder how the math works out for the prize structure ect, if its really long term +ev to play tighter. i havent tryed any but i wonder multis are still very top heavy and i would think playing a volume of them it would be -ev to be not being aggresive in some spots just my thoughts. i havent played any nor have i seen the structure so i really couldnt say. just a thought i guess .