View Plans & Pricing

If you are signed in and are seeing this message, please be sure you have selected a user name in My Profile. The forum requires it.
A A A
Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
sp_TopicIcon
stop n go
Hagbard Celine
Guest
Guests
1
May 3, 2010 - 1:52 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

so stop n goes used to be popular way back in the day before people really thought about things like hand ranges and fold equity. the idea was that you’re in a situation where there’s a loose opener in front of you, but you don’t really have a big enough stack to make him fold preflop with a shove.

 

so what people would do was flat-call the raise and then shove all flops, and although the opener would never fold preflop, he would end up missing the flop nearly 2/3s of the time and fold to the shove–a stop n go.

 

in todays games stop n gos don’t really work that well. good players will often just call the shove with most of their preflop opening range, making the play more or less useless.

 

but i think that the stop n go is handy in certain 3b/4b situations, like the one below.

 

i had been really active with raising, and i wasn’t folding to the 3bet–my plan was to get it in against the 3bettor. but when the action came back to me i noticed that if i called i would have almost exactly 1 pot-sized bet left, and thought that although he was never folding to my shove PF, that if i called he might fold on the flop–like AK/AQ on T52 or 88/99 on KT2.

 

anyway, i saved the hand to post here and get your thoughts.

 

PokerStars Game #43515909807: Tournament

#308010597, $50+$5 USD Hold’em No Limit – Level

XIII (600/1200) – 2010/05/02 18:45:54 ET
Table ‘308010597 47’ 9-max Seat #4 is the button
Seat 1: PeteDeKorver (21079 in chips)
Seat 2: agriffrod (62422 in chips)
Seat 4: ExtravaDanza (23241 in chips)
Seat 5: mendieta19 (39674 in chips)
Seat 6: Babooyah (90342 in chips)
Seat 7: robert07 (22843 in chips)
Seat 8: peko (31296 in chips)
Seat 9: Prometheus R (26049 in chips)
PeteDeKorver: posts the ante 125
agriffrod: posts the ante 125
ExtravaDanza: posts the ante 125
mendieta19: posts the ante 125
Babooyah: posts the ante 125
robert07: posts the ante 125
peko: posts the ante 125
Prometheus R: posts the ante 125
mendieta19: posts small blind 600
Babooyah: posts big blind 1200
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Prometheus R [Ah Qc]
robert07: folds
peko: folds
Prometheus R: raises 1800 to 3000
PeteDeKorver: raises 4999 to 7999
agriffrod: folds
ExtravaDanza: folds
mendieta19: folds
Babooyah: folds
Prometheus R: calls 4999
*** FLOP *** [7c Th Td]
Prometheus R: bets 17925 and is all-in

 

P.S. sorry still having trouble with the converter. the new one doesn’t convert for me at all.

bigdogpckt5s
Guest
Guests
2
May 3, 2010 - 9:32 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

lol is this a level? Are you being for real with this post lol. First of all you have a premium hand for when you have around 20 bigs. And you have a guy that seems to want to get it in pre. You open that pot for action and got it so get the chips in because hes not folding pre. I also feel stop and goes are designed for hands that flop good but are not premium hands. I would never dream of playing this hand this way. I guess because your a little deeper then the normal stack that would try a stop and go he might fold so there is a little value in it that way. However im putting these chips in pre.

Deal
Guest
Guests
3
May 3, 2010 - 9:56 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory
0

Almost looks like you saved him chips versus maximize yours. Had he hit this flop with his drawing hand he would stack you, but if he misses he saves 17925 chips that he otherwise would have put in for you to win had you just shoved pre. It’s really unlikely that any hands that had you beat preflop are folding to your stop n go.

If you had complete garbage then maybe there is a case for this play… ? idk

 

BBird40
Guest
Guests
4
May 3, 2010 - 11:37 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory
0

Now correct me if I am wrong, these are my initial thoughts.

 

The villian is he the type of player that notices your activity and might 3-bet lighter than usual against you? However, would the fear of the people behind make his range not so light, therefore his hand could be strong?

At this level, is this a normal 3-bet? I have been told that you should 2.5 to 3x the original raiser on a 3-bet? Is he trying to get you off the hand cheaply? Or is he 3-betting like this to keep you interested and induce a 4-bet shove on you? Or is he betting cheaply so he could get off the hand without calling your 4-bet shove? With his stack why does he not just shove?

 

^^^This is what I tend to have problems with. Is the guy trying to induce a shove from me, or is he trying to bet that low so he can get away if I shove? (At the micros, its normally to induce a shove)

 

As far as my take on the hand goes,

Pete is in that 18BB range. You raised about 2.5x and he 3-bet you, why does he not just shove? I think he does not shove b/c he is waiting for you or some1 behind him to put him to the test. So, with this mindset I think he has a decent hand. Again, I don’t play at the 50 dollar level so I couldn’t be entirely sure.

 

However, I don’t think the Stop N Go play benefits you here with this hand. I believe your hand plays best pre-flop, and a hand like 78s plays better post-flop. So, with your stack size I would shove instead of stop n go.

Hagbard Celine
Guest
Guests
5
May 3, 2010 - 12:40 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

bigdogpckt5s said:

lol is this a level? Are you being for real with this post lol. First of all you have a premium hand for when you have around 20 bigs. And you have a guy that seems to want to get it in pre. You open that pot for action and got it so get the chips in because hes not folding pre. I also feel stop and goes are designed for hands that flop good but are not premium hands. I would never dream of playing this hand this way. I guess because your a little deeper then the normal stack that would try a stop and go he might fold so there is a little value in it that way. However im putting these chips in pre.


 

not a level.

 

obviously i usually just get it in PF, and generally we’re just getting it in on the flop with 1PSB, but with this play–or at least the idea is–that a non-zero percent of the time he folds to my shove and i win the pot without showdown. how is that bad?

Hagbard Celine
Guest
Guests
6
May 3, 2010 - 12:43 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Deal said:

Almost looks like you saved him chips versus maximize yours. Had he hit this flop with his drawing hand he would stack you, but if he misses he saves 17925 chips that he otherwise would have put in for you to win had you just shoved pre. It’s really unlikely that any hands that had you beat preflop are folding to your stop n go.

If you had complete garbage then maybe there is a case for this play… ? idk

 


 

how is that? because he’s 3b/calling AJ/AT?

 

while i do think that AJ can be in his range, i also think there are a lot of pairs, and getting them to fold some of the times i miss the flop but it’s bad for him is a fine outcome. not to mention the possibility that he lays down AK on some rag flop.

 

idk maybe i’m overthinking but i think there’s merit to having plays like these in your arsenal and not just playing some formulaic game.

HITTHEPANDA
Guest
Guests
7
May 3, 2010 - 2:37 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

I think there are better ways to deviate from a formulaic game than to stopngo in this situation.  I may even fold pre in some spots but you saying you had been opening a lot makes me feel getting this in preflop is fine.  There is just no need for this play… if you aren’t ahead of his range, stopngoing the flop isn’t going to be any better than shipping it in pre, except that you may be putting more of your chips in with less equity than you had preflop.  Your best case is the flop comes KJ and he has 99 and folds, but even if 1 overcard comes hes probably calling anyway if for no reason than out of spite.  Just ship or fold, keep your shortstack ranges balanced.

BBird40
Guest
Guests
8
May 3, 2010 - 4:26 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

I am just curious as to why the villian here would 3bet like this and not just 3-bet shove? Anybody care to help me out with this?

 

 

Also hagbard, what did he have? My first initial guess, just due to how he bet in accordance to his stack size is JJ+, AQ+

Avatar
RonFezBuddy
New York City

TPE Management
Forum Posts: 2313
Member Since:
March 17, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
9
May 3, 2010 - 5:46 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

BBird40 said:

I am just curious as to why the villian here would 3bet like this and not just 3-bet shove? Anybody care to help me out with this?

 

 

Also hagbard, what did he have? My first initial guess, just due to how he bet in accordance to his stack size is JJ+, AQ+


 

If he’s a random, a lot of times it’s because he’s a bad player and wants to leave himself some room to fold if you shove because he’ll put you on a monster.

Hagbard Celine
Guest
Guests
10
May 4, 2010 - 12:40 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

BBird40 said:

I am just curious as to why the villian here would 3bet like this and not just 3-bet shove? Anybody care to help me out with this?

 

 

Also hagbard, what did he have? My first initial guess, just due to how he bet in accordance to his stack size is JJ+, AQ+


 

this is a really good question.

 

i didn’t think too much about it at the time because i was busy being fancy 😉 and because i’d been so active at the 500/1000 level (the blinds just went up) and had opened a few pots at this level in the past orbit or two.

 

as for the results i’m a pretty huge nit about not giving them because i don’t think they should matter too much, but once i feel that discussion has dried up i’ll post them for you.

Hagbard Celine
Guest
Guests
11
May 4, 2010 - 4:46 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

just in case anyone still cares, a friend of mine on another forum spelled out the math of this play pretty well imo. his name is sherman and he posts on 2p2 and LOLNS:

 

The question is, will he ever fold a hand on the flop that you would
have liked him to call you with. That is, getting 2:1 on the flop, are
there hands in his range that have less than 33% equity that he will
fold? If the answer is yes, the SnG might be wrong (but still could be
right depending on how many and how many hands that are getting greater
than 33% equity that he will fold). If the answer is no, then the SnG
absolutely must be 100% right.

So to summarize, the key variables are:

1) Probability villain folds a hand on the flop with < 33% equity.
2) Probability villain folds a hand on the flop with > 33% equity.

The
greater #1 is the more $ SnG costs you. The greater #2 is the more $
SnG makes you (obviously). So if villain always calls with #2 hands and
never with #1 hands, SnG is probably wrong. But as villain calls with
#1 hands more and folds with #2 hands less, SnG makes more $.

Imo, SnG probably makes more $ here than shoving pre.

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 2780

Currently Online:
9 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

bennymacca: 2616

Foucault: 2067

folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133

praetor: 1033

theginger45: 924

P-aire 146: 832

Turbulence: 768

The Riceman: 731

duggs: 591

florianm1: 588

Newest Members:

GBW198

Johnelwood

Bocheech21

alexalex2015

oneout2many

JLPicard

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 24

Topics: 12705

Posts: 75003

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1063

Members: 11991

Moderators: 2

Admins: 5

Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos

Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1