View Plans & Pricing

If you are signed in and are seeing this message, please be sure you have selected a user name in My Profile. The forum requires it.
A A A
Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
sp_TopicIcon
TPE training hand--Shove, reshove and hero calls all-in with A-9 offsuit
rppoker
Midstakes Master
Members
Forum Posts: 115
Member Since:
September 3, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
September 27, 2018 - 12:35 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

There is a hand I would like to discuss from a TPE training video I just watched. I don’t want to say whose video it is because I don’t want this to come across as me saying look how much smarter I am than the pro. I’m not smarter. The pro is a stud who does great videos. But I do disagree with the play that was made, and I want to talk it through.

The hero just lost two big hands in a row where all the money went in preflop versus smaller stacks. The first he had A-Q suited vs. Q-Q. The second hand he suffered a bad beat as he had A-Q offsuit vs. j-9 offsuit and villain binked a 9 on the river. So now hero has gone from 71,488 chips to 24,640 chips.

This is a WCOOP $265 NLH event. Blinds are $2,500/$5,000 Ante $625.

Hero is in the cutoff.

SB $90,035

BB $26,340

UTG $9,988

UTG+1 $28,461

MP $117,540

MP+1 $112,071

MP+2 $62,899

HERO (CO) $24,015

BTN $43,137

 

UTG bets $9,988 (all-in), 3 folds, MP+2 bets $62,899 (all-in), Hero (CO) calls $24,015 (all-in), 3 folds.

 

UTG has Ac, 6c

MP+2 has Jd, Qc

Hero has As, 9d

 

What I want to discuss is whether hero should have made the call and gone all-in to two shoves ahead of him.

Let’s discuss ranges without knowing what the players have. UTG has only 9,988 chips and the blinds are $2,500/$5,000 Ante $625. I don’t really understand why UTG allowed himself to get this short stacked. He needed to get it in a while ago. If he doesn’t play this hand he pretty much blinds off the next two hands. So UTG can really have any two cards. Absolutely nothing to fear. If hero was the first player to reshove I’d have no problem with that move. But before hero got to act, MP+2 shoves all-in. MP+2 has a 12 BB stack which isn’t unbelievably deep but it is a lot healthier than hero’s stack. So now the question becomes, should hero have made the all-in call with As, 9d?

Let’s look at ranges without knowing what cards everyone else has. UTG inexplicably has let himself get down to only 2BB. Plus, he will be in the small blind next hand and the big blind the hand after that. He almost had no choice but to play this hand since hets essentially gets blinded out the next two hands. So UTG can truly have any two cards. No reason to be afraid of this bet. MP+2 has 12 BB, which isn’t unbelievably deep but it is still a stack two-and-a-half times the size of hero. Yes, it is possible that MP+2 is trying to isolate UTG light, but given the fact that the small blind has him comfortably covered. This would point to MP+2 having something. A premium hand is possible, but so is a small pair or medium+ suited connected or a couple of non-premium Broadway cards.

Knowing this, should hero call all-in with 5BB with As, 9d? This seems pretty light to me. I get that he needs to get it in relatively soon but is this a good enough spot to do so? If hero was the first person to put chips in the pot after the UTG all-in bet I would agree with shoving. But given that a second player who has him covered has shoved, hero getting it in seems really thin.

As it turns out, hero gets it is about as good as you could hope for. His A-9 offsuit has A-6 suited comfortably beat preflop (57% to 28%). His A-9 offsuit has Q-J offsuit slightly beat preflop (56% to 43%).

But he is not going head’s up on this hand after everyone gets it in preflop. When you calculate what everyone has in a poker odds calculator, hero wins 31.6% of the time, MP+2 wins 42.31% of the time and UTG wins 19.89% of the time. And these are the odds when hero’s opponents turn over cards as friendly as could possibly be imagined for hero.

Now I suppose you could say that hero really only needs to beat MP+2 since UTG has so few chips. But I really can’t see MP+2 making the play he did with a worse ace than hero’s A-9. I also can’t see MP+2 making the move he did with two non-paired undercards to A-9. So at best hero has one overcard to MP+2’s range which it turns out is the case (and I think MP+2 shoved much wider than could be reasonably expected). So given all of the hands that MP+2 could have been shoving with that would have dominated hero, and given how small a favorite hero would be against the absolute bottom of MP+2’s range, I would make the argument that hero should have folded preflop and waited for a better spot.

Does anyone have a different perspective than me? I am curious what the case is to be made for hero getting it all in after a shove (small) and a re-shove (bigger than hero’s stack). I am interested in people’s opinions to either side of this argument.

The cards came 10h, 8d, 4s, 4h, Qd and hero got knocked out on the river.

Maniackid11
Eating Fish
Balla
Members
Forum Posts: 316
Member Since:
November 28, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
September 27, 2018 - 5:49 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory
0

 UTG has 2 BBs, and NASH shove is like 90% of starting hands from this position with that many BBs.

MP3 with 12-13BBs has a 24.5%-26% shove range.

A9o has roughly 47-50% equity against MP3s entire shove range.

What I am understanding from these hands/numbers is that HERO and Villains are playing GTO and each of them are making the correct decisions to Shove.

You can google push/fold charts. Generally speaking, you can shove optimally between 1-25BB. Knowing your opponents are doing this, it makes it easier deciding, when a short stack is shoving, whether or not you can call profitably.

Also, a few TPE members, including Andrew Brokos have recommended an app called SnapShove. You can download it on android, apple, and desktop. The pro version (which has many more features than the basic free version is like $14.99 or something). SnapShove actually has this cool interactive training program where it will quiz you on a bunch of shove/ call shove situations.

rppoker
Midstakes Master
Members
Forum Posts: 115
Member Since:
September 3, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
September 27, 2018 - 3:57 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Hi Maniackid. I do use SnapShove. I find it very helpful to know shoving ranges.

One thing I am curious to know is when looking at a situation like this against an opponent we may have never faced, how do we know if he is playing perfect GTO? It seems to me there are three possibilities: 1) he understands shove ranges well and is playing close to perfect GTO; 2) he understands shove ranges but uses a slightly tighter version, which I think may be the case with some players, 3) he is not following the optimal shove ranges and waits for premium hands. There probably is no way to know for absolute certainty so maybe this is just a rhetorical question. But if you don’t know if your opponent is a GTO shove master/proponent how do you go about determining what his range is when forced to make this difficult call?

If he is GTO shove optimal (option 1), your percentages above indicate it is close but maybe you grudgingly make the call.  If he knows GTO optimal but plays a slightly tighter version of it (option 2) your numbers above might indicate it is close but you lean toward a fold. If he only makes this move with premium hands (option 3) then it seems to me this is a clear fold. If you were a supercomputer instead of a human I suppose you could assign a percentage to each of the three options and then make your decision pretty easily, but given that we are human beings working in real time this seems really difficult to calculate. I suppose it is something of a feel thing and the more you play the more you can trust your instincts.

Maniackid11
Eating Fish
Balla
Members
Forum Posts: 316
Member Since:
November 28, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
September 27, 2018 - 5:01 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory
0

The thing with GTO is that WE are able to play optimal if we think  that our opponents are shoving GTO. IF you know that your opponent is a nit and doesn’t shove unless “he has it” then your decision becomes clear, and you fold (unless you ‘have it’).

I know what you’re getting at with this question because I used to wonder the same things. But we must look at our opponents ranges compared to our hand. If we know that a GTO MP3 shove range with 12bb looks like this: AA-22,AKo-A4o,KQo-KTo,QJo,JTo,AKs-A2s,KQs-K7s,QJs-Q8s,JTs-J8s,T9s-T8s,98s,87s then it becomes a clear (although sometimes might feel hard to make) call with a hand as ‘weak’ as A9o.

Because think of this in another way: if you KNOW your opponent has it when he shoves 12bb from MP3 then his strategy becomes extremely exploitable, and unless we have AA or something, we just fold every time. And let’s face it, how often are you going to have something like QQ+ or AK with 12bb from MP3? You probably wont win much if you wait around for those top 4 hands, unless you get extremely lucky and get one of them every time you have a shove stack…which doesn’t happen often.

If you discipline yourself to get comfortable shoving wider than those 4 hands, then shoving with a 12bb stack from MP3 with any hand from that range, is not only correct, but becomes much more profitable in the long run.

Some of the success attributed to the GTO NASH shove ranges comes from the fold equity as well.

If we become results oriented, then making a call with A9o in this particular hand was a great call. If we make the same call with the same hand but this time MP3 has AA, then the direct result wasn’t great for us. But if we make this call everytime against a 12bb stack from MP3 then (in the long run) it’s correct.

Maniackid11
Eating Fish
Balla
Members
Forum Posts: 316
Member Since:
November 28, 2015
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
September 27, 2018 - 5:18 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

“If he is GTO shove optimal (option 1), your percentages above indicate it is close but maybe you grudgingly make the call. If he knows GTO optimal but plays a slightly tighter version of it (option 2) your numbers above might indicate it is close but you lean toward a fold. If he only makes this move with premium hands (option 3) then it seems to me this is a clear fold. If you were a supercomputer instead of a human I suppose you could assign a percentage to each of the three options and then make your decision pretty easily, but given that we are human beings working in real time this seems really difficult to calculate. I suppose it is something of a feel thing and the more you play the more you can trust your instincts.”

Option 1: If you’re not willing to make the call with a hand the has 50% then you blind out of the tournament.

Option 2: This option implies you have somewhat of a read on your opponent, which means you fold when the strength of your hand is much weaker than the strength of your opponents perceived shove range.

Option 3: This option implies you have a strong read on your opponent and you take complete advantage of it by only calling when you have him crushed.

Option 4: You stick to the GTO shove ranges and adjust to each opponent as you become aware of what they are doing and play accordingly.

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 2780

Currently Online:
4 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

bennymacca: 2616

Foucault: 2067

folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133

praetor: 1033

theginger45: 924

P-aire 146: 832

Turbulence: 768

The Riceman: 731

duggs: 591

florianm1: 588

Newest Members:

Johnelwood

Bocheech21

alexalex2015

oneout2many

JLPicard

Jackarmi

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 24

Topics: 12705

Posts: 75003

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1063

Members: 11990

Moderators: 2

Admins: 5

Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos

Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1