View Plans & Pricing

If you are signed in and are seeing this message, please be sure you have selected a user name in My Profile. The forum requires it.
A A A
Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed
Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
sp_TopicIcon
Study Group Week 1 HH discussion
JDOG1645
Guest
Guests
1
July 18, 2010 - 11:32 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory
0

Week 1

 Above is the link to week 1 HH history.  Please take a minute and check out the PMs I sent out to those that wanted to be involved in the group.  Again we need your HHs to make this work.

 

Pokerstars $10+1 27man  MTT SnG  217 hands

 

I played pretty much on auto pilot early on as I was playing several tables. I dont recall any hand that stood out to me. I missed up a couple blind stealing spots. I play a  K9s hand rather loose in the middle stages, I thought I had a read on the guy.  End game we play almost 100 hands HU and I felt my opponent wasnt very good HU and was somewhat predictable. I missed a couple chances to  bet and take down the pot. All and all I felt I played ok…..looking forward to discuss the action and specific hands.

TaijiX
Guest
Guests
2
July 19, 2010 - 2:37 am
sp_Permalink
0
Awaiting Moderation

JDOG1645
Guest
Guests
3
July 19, 2010 - 2:42 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Try now I fixed it.

TaijiX
Guest
Guests
4
July 19, 2010 - 3:53 am
sp_Permalink
0
Awaiting Moderation

Avatar
Killingbird
Cary, NC

TPE Management
Forum Posts: 4582
Member Since:
April 6, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
July 19, 2010 - 8:16 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Hand #50: Folding if jammed over your flop bet?  I like checking behind turn because it induces a river bet alot.  Can we consider raising for value on this river?

 

Hand #75: Would a checkraise be better here?

 

Side note…at 100/200 i notice you are changing your raise sizes from 425 to 455.  Do you do this alot?  FWIW, I change my raise sizes quite often, so I dont think it is really a bad thing.  Just curious.

 

Hand #101: I can see an argument for jamming turn.  Obviously we at the very least have to call.

 

Hand #105:  I think I just ship it in preflop here.  If he is trapping with a monster, so be it.  But there is penty in the pot to go ahead and take it down.

 

Hand #107: Two limpers.  We have ~13 BBs.  Jam pre?  Lots of dead money!!

 

Hand #117:  I think we miss some value here on the river. 

 

Hand #173: Not sure i love flatting 8Tcc.  We are going to have position, but now we are playing a big odl bloated pot with a marginal hand. short of flopping a straight or flush draw im not sure what flop we are really hoping for here.

 

Nicely done!!

Avatar
RonFezBuddy
New York City

TPE Management
Forum Posts: 2313
Member Since:
March 17, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
July 19, 2010 - 10:08 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

I didn't realize we had a permission set here that required a moderator to approve a post.  Should be fixed now.

JDOG1645
Guest
Guests
7
July 19, 2010 - 11:59 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory
0

Killingbird said:

Hand #50: Folding if jammed over your flop bet?  I like checking behind turn because it induces a river bet alot.  Can we consider raising for value on this river?

 JD – Yeah Im folding if he jams flop, I think he was an ok player.  I think there are pros and cons to raising the river.  First I was very affraid he had A rag and kinda felt if we raise we arent getting called by anything we are ahead of. However by checking the turn it does make our hand look somewhat weak (air, draw, small PP) so there could be some value by raising the river but would he pay off with his say 77?  I dont think so because I think my image was pretty solid, and so to be honest I have seen a lot of people play trips by betting flop checking turn and betting or raising river. I guess there may have been some thin value but would have been gross if jams over our raise on the river simply because he doesnt think we have an A and would need at least that to call.

 

Hand #75: Would a checkraise be better here?

 I think maybe your right, but I was affraid no one would bet on this limped pot and I didnt want to see a 2 or 6 peel so I decided to fire out. To try and thin the field and I figured maybe an over pair would raise if like 77 was out there or maybe Ax will pay to see the turn.

 

Side note…at 100/200 i notice you are changing your raise sizes from 425 to 455.  Do you do this alot?  FWIW, I change my raise sizes quite often, so I dont think it is really a bad thing.  Just curious.

 I dont on puprose  as long as its between 425-455. I think a lot of player have those little amounts they use, I notice Casey will have a couple little different amounts he uses a some blind. Like I see him sometimes use x55 or x99.

 

Hand #101: I can see an argument for jamming turn.  Obviously we at the very least have to call.

 I agree we could jam turn again I saw monsters under the bed. I think his small bet is one of two things, a draw trying to see a cheap river card and maybe get some folds/2nd or thrid pair or Q rag since he was in the blinds and he was playing it cautious. If he does have Q rag and I jam there its clear I dont have a Q or better because I would have bet the flop on that board. Plus I had a person still to act behind me. So I tried to get to the river for cheap.  But I see why a lot of people would consider a jam there and to be honest thats my usual style 🙂

 

Hand #105:  I think I just ship it in preflop here.  If he is trapping with a monster, so be it.  But there is penty in the pot to go ahead and take it down.

100% agree

 

Hand #107: Two limpers.  We have ~13 BBs.  Jam pre?  Lots of dead money!!

Yeah again we are close the bubble and I played it like a puss. Looking back at it now the only worries I would have is if someone behind me woke up with a hand. I dont even think the open limp guy is strong based on blinds and stack sizes.

 

Hand #117:  I think we miss some value here on the river.

 

 Yup when he checks turn he is saying he doesnt have an A. I should hav bet like 1/3 pot I think.

 

Hand #173: Not sure i love flatting 8Tcc.  We are going to have position, but now we are playing a big odl bloated pot with a marginal hand. short of flopping a straight or flush draw im not sure what flop we are really hoping for here.

 

I play a lot of HU sngs and if I think I have some reads  on the player I love these types of hands.   I was certain he would fire flop after reraising me and I had decided that if I caught  a piece or a draw I was going to jamb because he would fold without a monster.  It was clear he was getting tired of my raising the button or his limps. He liked to talk at the table every time he was forced to fold and tell people  ohh you caught X.  I may have even jammed if  it came like 246. It was funnny as he folded he typed nice catch. So I showed and said something back like what catch?   But anyhow I was certain he wasnt very good HU due to all his limping on the button, he was trying to see cheap flops while waiting for monsters.  I missed some shots to steal some pots HU but I felt I was better and if given enough time and the right hands I was going to get him.

 

Nicely done!!

TYTY


JDOG1645
Guest
Guests
8
July 19, 2010 - 12:04 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

RonFezBuddy said:

I didn't realize we had a permission set here that required a moderator to approve a post.  Should be fixed now.


Thank you sirSmile

shortymurphy
Guest
Guests
9
July 19, 2010 - 7:21 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Boy I must be dumb….i can't find the actual link to the HH?  probably something obv but I don't see it.

pedactor
Guest
Guests
10
July 19, 2010 - 8:38 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Ok…so here goes nothing. I'm going to do this without looking at the other posts so it maybe some repeats….but want to try this without any other influence.

 

Hand 14: Check raise is fine, but on the smaller side….could be pricing in draws on that board. Also, I thik it could be missing value….if he's intent on calling, he'll throw in some extra chips. Turn bet same thing.

 

Hand 16: No biggie, but could have opened here. Early TAG fold I'm sure is fine too.

 

Hand 23: Same as before. Potential open to mix up your range….but fold is fine.

 

Hand 65: Opening the pot there is fine, but not sure about folding to a 3 bet shove with a stack of 8.5 bb. If we can't call then probably shouldn't open. Of course I have no reads or stats on player here…..so could be dependent on that.

 

Hand 76: Shove….bb only has 4 bb stack and we probably should be shoving a huge range here.

 

Hand 88: Probably a shove, same as above (didn't run any ICM numbers here though)

 

Hand 105: I'm shoving his sb limp here

 

Ok….I'm going to stop there for now as I'm at the point of heads up. My heads up game is seriously weak so I won't go into that as of yet. Outside of the hands mentioned….I would say the only other thing in general is I found your C-bets to be on the larger side. I think you can make them smaller and still achieve the same result.

 

Well…..that's my review. Look forward to seeing others….

JDOG1645
Guest
Guests
11
July 19, 2010 - 8:50 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

shortymurphy said:

Boy I must be dumb….i can't find the actual link to the HH?  probably something obv but I don't see it.


The link itself is in the first post it should green “Week 1”  let me know if you cant find it.

JDOG1645
Guest
Guests
12
July 19, 2010 - 9:03 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

pedactor said:

Ok…so here goes nothing. I'm going to do this without looking at the other posts so it maybe some repeats….but want to try this without any other influence.

 

Good idea and then afterwards we can go deeper into a specific hand.

 

Hand 14: Check raise is fine, but on the smaller side….could be pricing in draws on that board. Also, I thik it could be missing value….if he's intent on calling, he'll throw in some extra chips. Turn bet same thing.

 

Both good points and I think your right as I look at it again.

 

Hand 16: No biggie, but could have opened here. Early TAG fold I'm sure is fine too.

 

Yeah thats why.

 

Hand 23: Same as before. Potential open to mix up your range….but fold is fine.

 

Yeah I agree could go either way. I think I was playing several  tables still and wasnt looking to mix it up too much yet with marginal hands but I think it could easily have been opened also.

 

Hand 65: Opening the pot there is fine, but not sure about folding to a 3 bet shove with a stack of 8.5 bb. If we can't call then probably shouldn't open. Of course I have no reads or stats on player here…..so could be dependent on that.

 

I think he was kind of tight. I think our hand would fair well against his range but I dont think we are ahead. We may have been getting a good price but I recall thinking about my stack size as the second big at the table a call and lose and Im down to 6th position. I honestly wasnt expecting him to wake up and do something.  This would be a great hand to discuss more in depth after everyone gives there initial response.

 

Hand 76: Shove….bb only has 4 bb stack and we probably should be shoving a huge range here.

 

Yeah I think your right, I figured we would call with anything but still I think its a shove.

 

Hand 88: Probably a shove, same as above (didn't run any ICM numbers here though)

 Same a s above

Hand 105: I'm shoving his sb limp here

 Yeah I think its the first time he limped and didnt know what to think of it, if I recall correctly he did it several other times and I raised..or I could be thinking about another tourney.  The first time they do that and its deep Im always worried about a big hand…monster under the bed?

 

Ok….I'm going to stop there for now as I'm at the point of heads up. My heads up game is seriously weak so I won't go into that as of yet. Outside of the hands mentioned….I would say the only other thing in general is I found your C-bets to be on the larger side. I think you can make them smaller and still achieve the same result.

 I typically cbet around half pot, what are you recommending…. depending on if the board has draws or not and how many player still in etc etc I may bet more but for the most part I aim around half pot and go from there.

 

Well…..that's my review. Look forward to seeing others….


lespaulgman
Member Moderator
Forum Posts: 626
Member Since:
June 11, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
13
July 19, 2010 - 10:05 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0
Okay so I couldn't wait and I started looking through and analyzing. I am sure I will have more thoughts and questions as time goes by, but here is round 1!
Hand 13 — once you hit your set on the flop, you re-raised the flop bet and led out on the turn. Knowing that for most of the hands that seblast35 has played he has shown no ability to slow down or fold, what do you think about a check/call on the flop, check/call on the turn (represent some form of Broadway draw) then a check/shove on the river to get him to look you up? 
Hand 43 — Six handed with the tight image that you have on the table, would you consider opening 56s? It is something that I would try almost as a semi-steal. If I get all of the folds then great and grab the blinds, but there is a lot of potential to hit a sneaky non-obvious flop, or to rep a ton of different hands due to your image. Wondering what others think on this one.
Hand 49 — At any point in that are you concerned the ace or a straight may be in his range (67s, since the odds a queen is there is low)?
Hand 86 — I am curious about your decision to 3bet shove on this one. The initial raise is way big for the blind level and his stack so he my read is he is clearly committed to this pot and he loves his hand. He has been pretty tight with the only hand showndown in the past 40 being 56s. I like the move, I am just curious how you settled on it and were confident you were going to come out on top.
Hand 93 — 5 handed I don't hate the K9s to raise and try to steal with. Him shoving over your flop bet though screams to mean that I am probably hosed here and I hate my kicker so I am not sure I could have called him. There was no way in hell I could have put him on 67s, but given his stack size preflop (11bb or so) I could have put him on a call with K6 or K7. I would love to hear you talk a bit about why you made the call.
Hands-94-96 — I really like your punishment of the limpers on this one. Something that occured to me, at any point were you concerned that jdp39 was going to try to trap you?
Hand 100 — You open raised with ~15bb effective, why not open shove here?
Hand 106 — Smart laydown.
Hand 107 — If the villian bets somewhere between t900-t1200 on the turn do you give him credit for the Queen and fold or do you float to the river and try to hit? I think calling him was fine since the bet was really clowny.
Heads-Up Play — Seeing it was our old friend from back around Hand 13 and knowing how clowny he had been there, I would have a tremendous amount of confidence going into this play. Things looked pretty standard there to me, playing virtually ATCs as aggressively as possible. Interested in what others think on some of the questions I have above.
jshilling09
Playing The Prelims
Members
Forum Posts: 543
Member Since:
June 25, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
14
July 20, 2010 - 1:46 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Hand 13- the 77 hand, don't mind the check raise on the flop, but I sometimes like to check the turn, bet the river, because it looks SOOOOOO bluffy.  side note on the hand, anytime someone talks to me during the hand, and now everyone will use this against me lol, but for the sake of learning, i put them on a big hand.  I doubt this person is good enough to think about that, but just in general, best to save the trash talk for after the hand(something I do too much haha).

 

– The 44 hand, especially from early position, I don't mind limp calling a raise, you can't call a re-raise, and especially at this buy in, you will get a lot of people flatting behind you, and there aren't too many great flops for your hand.  If you get two callers, you can't really c-bet, so I think seeing a cheep flop is best.  If you get a raise, that signals a strong hand, one that will get it in most of the time when you flop your set, so you are getting okay, not great odds to set mine, depending on his raise size,

to tell you the truth, I don't mind a fold from early position here either.

 

I have to go, so I will hopefully make a second post on the rest of the hands

Surprised (my new signature smiley haha) 

JDOG1645
Guest
Guests
15
July 20, 2010 - 3:00 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print sp_EditHistory
0

I will reply to the above posts tomorrow Im off to bed deep run in 12K guarantee 14th…just wish it was deeper Yell

JDOG1645
Guest
Guests
16
July 20, 2010 - 12:01 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

lespaulgman said:

Okay so I couldn't wait and I started looking through and analyzing. I am sure I will have more thoughts and questions as time goes by, but here is round 1!
 
Hand 13 — once you hit your set on the flop, you re-raised the flop bet and led out on the turn. Knowing that for most of the hands that seblast35 has played he has shown no ability to slow down or fold, what do you think about a check/call on the flop, check/call on the turn (represent some form of Broadway draw) then a check/shove on the river to get him to look you up? 
I think your talkin bout hand 14 (77)   I felt that flop could have hit his range and I didnt want to give potential free cards especially if I thought he cant fold fold I wanted to make him pay for any draw he may have. Yes Im showing great strength the way I played it but now the turn card is another card that could hit his range and it helps the draw. I would play it differently if the flop was dry or maybe if the turn was a 2 I could have checked and it would have lucked bluffy. But on that turn I didnt want to slow down. 
 
Hand 43 — Six handed with the tight image that you have on the table, would you consider opening 56s? It is something that I would try almost as a semi-steal. If I get all of the folds then great and grab the blinds, but there is a lot of potential to hit a sneaky non-obvious flop, or to rep a ton of different hands due to your image. Wondering what others think on this one.
I probably could have but the BB was so short stacked I expected him to shove wide.
 
Hand 49 — At any point in that are you concerned the ace or a straight may be in his range (67s, since the odds a queen is there is low)?
 I was really only worried about A rag and had he made a full house, my checking the turn does show some weakness or it could be a monster and I made a fullhouse. Clearly there is no value in raising the river. I decided to call any reasonable river bet, he jams I fold but he gave me a great price to look him up.
 
Hand 86 — I am curious about your decision to 3bet shove on this one. The initial raise is way big for the blind level and his stack so he my read is he is clearly committed to this pot and he loves his hand. He has been pretty tight with the only hand showndown in the past 40 being 56s. I like the move, I am just curious how you settled on it and were confident you were going to come out on top.
Well he was so short stacked, I dont always think that when a shorty puts in half his stack preflop he has a monster. I cant simply call and AQ is just to good to laydown there so lets get it in and let the hand play itself.  I expected to see any PP, any broadway, K9s+, A5s+, A8o.
 
Hand 93 — 5 handed I don't hate the K9s to raise and try to steal with. Him shoving over your flop bet though screams to mean that I am probably hosed here and I hate my kicker so I am not sure I could have called him. There was no way in hell I could have put him on 67s, but given his stack size preflop (11bb or so) I could have put him on a call with K6 or K7. I would love to hear you talk a bit about why you made the call.
 I like my open there and obviously we are going to cbet. When he jams to be honest I just didnt believe him, I thought he had like A7, 88 maybe 89. I was getting better than 2 to 1. It wasnt a fist pump call but I made it, I was shocked to see 76.
 
Hands-94-96 — I really like your punishment of the limpers on this one. Something that occured to me, at any point were you concerned that jdp39 was going to try to trap you?  
 
 I think if I recall correctly I hadnt had indication that he was tricky and would open limp UTG big and with so much dead money and our stack size had to go for it.
 
Hand 100 — You open raised with ~15bb effective, why not open shove here?
We could have, it may be a little more +EV to shove.
 
Hand 106 — Smart laydown.
easy imo  especially with the utg limp.
 
Hand 107 — If the villian bets somewhere between t900-t1200 on the turn do you give him credit for the Queen and fold or do you float to the river and try to hit? I think calling him was fine since the bet was really clowny.
 
His bet  was horrible, min bet there? Just seemed like he was taking a shot at the pot. You know what would have been interesting is if I shoved the river it would so much look like a busted flush draw, I wonder if he would have called with third pair.
 
Heads-Up Play — Seeing it was our old friend from back around Hand 13 and knowing how clowny he had been there, I would have a tremendous amount of confidence going into this play. Things looked pretty standard there to me, playing virtually ATCs as aggressively as possible. Interested in what others think on some of the questions I have above.
Thanks for the analysis it was very good. 

JDOG1645
Guest
Guests
17
July 20, 2010 - 12:11 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

jshilling09 said:

Hand 13- the 77 hand, don't mind the check raise on the flop, but I sometimes like to check the turn, bet the river, because it looks SOOOOOO bluffy.  side note on the hand, anytime someone talks to me during the hand, and now everyone will use this against me lol, but for the sake of learning, i put them on a big hand.  I doubt this person is good enough to think about that, but just in general, best to save the trash talk for after the hand(something I do too much haha).

 

Here is my reply to lespaulgman about this hand….I felt that flop could have hit his range and I didnt want to give potential free cards especially if I thought he cant fold fold I wanted to make him pay for any draw he may have. Yes Im showing great strength the way I played it but now the turn card is another card that could hit his range and it helps the draw. I would play it differently if the flop was dry or maybe if the turn was a 2 I could have checked and it would have lucked bluffy. But on that turn I didnt want to slow down.

 

I would have done what you mentioned if that Q didnt scare me 🙂

 

 

– The 44 hand, especially from early position, I don't mind limp calling a raise, you can't call a re-raise, and especially at this buy in, you will get a lot of people flatting behind you, and there aren't too many great flops for your hand.  If you get two callers, you can't really c-bet, so I think seeing a cheep flop is best.  If you get a raise, that signals a strong hand, one that will get it in most of the time when you flop your set, so you are getting okay, not great odds to set mine, depending on his raise size,

to tell you the truth, I don't mind a fold from early position here either.

 

I will fold small PP when Im shallow to the blinds unless I have no choice to shove. I never like to open limp anything.  Listen to Casey's commentary in the Early Stage video about playing PP and also watch HITTHEPANDA's video on playing small PP.  Im not just trying to set mine here. Obviously if we catch a set we are already building a pot which we want. I have good table image and Im raising from EP thats why I could cbet that flop and rep the A.  I limp there and the guy may not give me credit.  I dont always agree that if I limp someone behind me raises and that signals a strong hand.  I know if I see a tag limp in EP and he has shown down small PP in the past I will raise most anything late if I know the blinds wont get cute. Then if he calls he checks to me and I fire flop  and either take it down or he calls and I slow down.  I think we become somewhat exploitable when people pay attention and see us limp certain hands and raise others.  My thoughts are always in the order of can I raise, should I fold , must I limp/call.   But we all have our own style and if playing them in that manner works for you then I wouldnt stop.  But you certainly got me thinking about it and thats the purpose of the discussion 🙂

 

I have to go, so I will hopefully make a second post on the rest of the hands

Surprised (my new signature smiley haha)


tmck21
Guest
Guests
18
July 20, 2010 - 3:42 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

hey jdog,

#13- 77, like the aggressive play with check raise and lead the turn, but why bet so small (1/3 pot)? i figured j-10 or j-9 or something like that and would charge him to hit his draw if that's what he was on.

#49- when second ace came on turn wouldn't even a small raise here let you know where your at? min bet there always looks like a crap hand, although it does open the betting up again and probably have to call with your stack size. it just seems unlikely he has an ace when turn comes and he bets min.

#53-  why not re-raise other player? if he had ak most likely he would raise pre, and he could easily have a hand like j10s and be drawing. if he came back at you it would be a tough spot and probably have to fold, but i like to try and figure where i am at asap.

#95- love the shove with all the limpers. free money. could have done that with a much less hand.

#100- jj, would have risked a bet on flop and see who wanted to play. you could increase your stack by 65% if they lay it down. probably a bet of 800 leaving 11bb behind if guy behind jams or get a check raise from blinds. the turn comes and with everyone checking the flop, showing weakness, you now have more outs and i would have raisesd that guys min bet willing to get it in. he showed weakness on flop, then min bets the turn with 10bb in the pot. just not convinced that he has a big hand. maybe a qxs or something at best and would probably have to lay it down. at worst you still have outs.

that's basically it for me. hope my thoughts weren't too silly but i am a micro player looking to improve.

tmck21

JDOG1645
Guest
Guests
19
July 20, 2010 - 11:39 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

tmck21 said:

hey jdog,

#13- 77, like the aggressive play with check raise and lead the turn, but why bet so small (1/3 pot)? i figured j-10 or j-9 or something like that and would charge him to hit his draw if that's what he was on.

 

Yes that should have been a bigger  bet at least half pot to two thirds pot.

#49- when second ace came on turn wouldn't even a small raise here let you know where your at? min bet there always looks like a crap hand, although it does open the betting up again and probably have to call with your stack size. it just seems unlikely he has an ace when turn comes and he bets min.

 

Im not sure I follow he checked turn and I checked behind for pot control and to keep his air in, no money went in on the turn.  The river he bets small, I see no value in raising because there is a straight draw and a pair on the board we will only be called by better.

 

#53-  why not re-raise other player? if he had ak most likely he would raise pre, and he could easily have a hand like j10s and be drawing. if he came back at you it would be a tough spot and probably have to fold, but i like to try and figure where i am at asap.

 

 We could have reraised but I cant fold if comes over the top, he makes it 360 I make it somewhere around 1k, thats too much of my stack.  If he played it better he would have fired on the A turn. But I think the best way to have played it was to raise over the short stacks jam and play accordingly. First time I saw this guy limp utg, was sure what it meant.

 

#95- love the shove with all the limpers. free money. could have done that with a much less hand.

true

 

#100- jj, would have risked a bet on flop and see who wanted to play. you could increase your stack by 65% if they lay it down. probably a bet of 800 leaving 11bb behind if guy behind jams or get a check raise from blinds. the turn comes and with everyone checking the flop, showing weakness, you now have more outs and i would have raisesd that guys min bet willing to get it in. he showed weakness on flop, then min bets the turn with 10bb in the pot. just not convinced that he has a big hand. maybe a qxs or something at best and would probably have to lay it down. at worst you still have outs.

I actually was willing to let go of the hand against 3  with an over and it had some draws on the flop. I didnt want to be check raised so I played it slow and decided to see what action would be before me on the turn. His small bet on the turn was weak I figured a straight or Q would bet more because a flush was out and a bigger straight could be made.

 

that's basically it for me. hope my thoughts weren't too silly but i am a micro player looking to improve.

 

Nope I appreciate your comments all good feed back and discussions.

tmck21


JDOG1645
Guest
Guests
20
July 22, 2010 - 12:49 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Looks like we kind of covered the HH  for the most part. Anyone think there is a good hand as a group to discuss? I have maybe one, does anyone else?  We have a couple more days before the next person's HH

lespaulgman
Member Moderator
Forum Posts: 626
Member Since:
June 11, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
21
July 23, 2010 - 9:15 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

I am curious about the approach to Hand 107 if the betting played out differently than it did. The hand had you starting with KJo, folded to you. Raise to 800 (blinds are 200/400) and the BB calls. Flop comes 2h-7d-2d. 

 

Question #1 — If BB leads here do you credit him for connecting with the flop or is this air trying to be clever and take the pot (since the pot is about 60% of your stack and he has you outchipped by about 2x).

 

Hand goes check-check and the turn drops the Qc.

 

Question #2 — If BB bets t900-t1200 leading out, what do you put him on (slow playing set of 2's? Protecting a pair of 7's or connecting with the Queen given prior action)

Question #3 — BB leads for t400 into pot of t1975, given our stack size of t4260 what about the possibility of a re-raise all-in in this spot since the general read is weakness from the BB?

 

Kc comes on the river.

 

Question #4 — Does this change the read or plan for the hand any? Does the presence of the king on the river slow down any potential value bets as it could scare him off?

 

— I am interested in what folks think. This hand has had me thinking a lot this week.

JDOG1645
Guest
Guests
22
July 23, 2010 - 2:51 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

lespaulgman said:

I am curious about the approach to Hand 107 if the betting played out differently than it did. The hand had you starting with KJo, folded to you. Raise to 800 (blinds are 200/400) and the BB calls. Flop comes 2h-7d-2d.

 

Yeah I probably should have just bet the flop. But on the turn when he min bets Im simply not just believing him there, he bets more I fold.  Or if there river brings something other than a K or J  I fold to any further action. 

 

Question #1 — If BB leads here do you credit him for connecting with the flop or is this air trying to be clever and take the pot (since the pot is about 60% of your stack and he has you outchipped by about 2x).

 If he donks out for 1/2 pot or better I simply fold.  I have K high with no draws.  But I should have bet I think when he checks although it would be gross if he raises.

Hand goes check-check and the turn drops the Qc.

 

Question #2 — If BB bets t900-t1200 leading out, what do you put him on (slow playing set of 2's? Protecting a pair of 7's or connecting with the Queen given prior action)

It could be any of those things or a small PP…all of which has me beat. I would fold. 

Question #3 — BB leads for t400 into pot of t1975, given our stack size of t4260 what about the possibility of a re-raise all-in in this spot since the general read is weakness from the BB?

 You can do that if you know he is capable of folding imo.  If I would have at least some type of draw I would have considered that. I was actually considering making a play on the river if any diamond came or A for that matter. Usually that min bet is either really weak or air. Im not folding there with an over to the board.

Kc comes on the river.

 

Question #4 — Does this change the read or plan for the hand any? Does the presence of the king on the river slow down any potential value bets as it could scare him off?

 Well he donks small again on the river, so raising is thin maybe. We lose to and 2x, 77, Q7, KQ, k7 hands. I probably should have checked beind because if he raises Im not beating much. In hind site the min raise was probably the most value I could get from him on the river, but Im not sure I like it.

— I am interested in what folks think. This hand has had me thinking a lot this week.

Very good question, I like diving into a hand in more detail 


Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 2780

Currently Online:
15 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

bennymacca: 2616

Foucault: 2067

folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133

praetor: 1033

theginger45: 924

P-aire 146: 832

Turbulence: 768

The Riceman: 731

duggs: 591

florianm1: 588

Newest Members:

Johnelwood

Bocheech21

alexalex2015

oneout2many

JLPicard

Jackarmi

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 24

Topics: 12705

Posts: 75003

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1063

Members: 11990

Moderators: 2

Admins: 5

Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos

Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1