4 Responses to “WCOOP 6-Max HH Review with Andrew Brokos (Part 1)”

  1. Dooval

    Always good stuff Andrew! You mentioned it could be a significant financial and time commitment to use the cardrunner tool. Would you recommend another. Are simple postflop, flopzilla (holdeq), or even something as simple as pokerstove good choices as well?
    Thanks,
    Dooval

  2. PETER_BINKLAGE_420

    I’m having trouble fathoming how 77 is a fold in the SB at 8 minutes. According to HRC, even if utg is opening 12.5%, shoving 77 is a +1.1bb play. Seems unlikely he’s opening that tight (and also that he’s calling off perfectly).

  3. PETER_BINKLAGE_420

    Oops, was so shocked at the 77 fold I paused and commented before you went thru the hand in CREV. I find HRC is a better tool for these preflop situations because it does the equilibration and range-rebuilding for you. The 44 is way closer to a fold than the 77, though in practice it is probably a fine shove assuming opener is not opening nitty and calling a proper proportion of his nitty opening range.

  4. PETER_BINKLAGE_420

    One more for the road, HRC says K7o is a fold there vs an “optimal” shoving range for 20 beebs. Makes some sense, 20 beebs is a lot! Another remarkable thing about that spot is that K7o is a 0.6bb loser, K8o is breakeven, and K9o is +1.1bb. Those are some big differences across only three pips. If we can remove 99+, AQ+ from sb’s shoving range range K7o becomes a +0.2bb call. I still like the fold.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.