WCOOP Live Sweat with Andrew Brokos (Part 4)
[Total: 7 Average: 9.6/5]
You must sign in to vote
MORE IN THIS SERIES : Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 5
Concepts In This Video: High Stakes • HUD • Late Stages • live sweat • Poker Stars • Popular MTTs: Knockouts • sharkscope • zoom cash game
Riar
Andrew, dont get me wrong i’m not trying to be mean but i really think you are kinda wasted with this kinda of format: you have the rare ability to be able to express your tp in a very clear way that people easily understand, so in other words you are really good at teaching imho, and with this kind of format you cant (given the nature of the format not because of you) actually do that because, in a live sewat there are a lot of dead periods in which we lose time (especially with only 2 tables) + it’s harder for you to talk and play so your analysis cant be as in-depth and as accurate as it would be in a HH/ theory video.
All this not to say that your videos are super-bad or anything, just that are def not as good as the other that you normally make…
my humble opinion
Foucault
Thanks. I kinda feel the same way too, but some people were asking this format and seem to have enjoyed it.
ShowbizTom
Hey Andrew.
I wonder if you get a few minutes could you explain your HUD set up for Zoom? Either in the forum or maybe on your blog. As I said on Twitter I loved the zoom element to this series.
I would love a review of a few hundred zoom hands . Although don’t think the tournament crowd would probably go for it .
Don’t worry if you don’t have time for these things . Just a request.
Merry Christmas and thanks for your contribution to the poker world this year.
jamesquinnw
Can’t agree with OP here. I really enjoyed this series and wish you’d consider doing another sweat, even a middle ground like narrating a pre-recorded sweat a la Marc’s recent series.
Battle Cat
Disagree with OP! Loved this series, and learned a lot
Sen
Actualy I think the ideal format would be a sticking-it-to-yourself series or a sitcking-it-to-the-man with a review of an other player including his thoughts on his play. This would be great to find spots which are typical for making mistakes during play. You could then see/hear your thinking in-game and point out what is flawed here. Maybe even by just picking interesting spots etc. I guess this would take some time to produce, but could be a great format, especially because of your great teaching and in-depth-analysis skills when having the time.