View Plans & Pricing

If you are signed in and are seeing this message, please be sure you have selected a user name in My Profile. The forum requires it.
A A A
Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

sp_Feed
Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 Topic Rating: 0 (0 votes) 
sp_TopicIcon
3 bet shove. Linear or Polarized?
3for3
High Stakes Shark
Members
Forum Posts: 201
Member Since:
July 24, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
1
February 20, 2020 - 11:03 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

From a thread on 2+2.  The setup is 2 limpers, to a ‘very competent’ player, who raises to 4.25BB.  Folds to hero in BB who has 33BB.

This brings us to the question in the title.  What should our 3 bet shove range look like?  My thoughts are:

1. I do not have a 3 bet size that is less than AI.  I guess we could make it something like 13.5BB, but I prefer to shove my 3 bet range.

2. I do think we can be polarized here.  

Foucault

TPE Pro
Members
Forum Posts: 2067
Member Since:
December 6, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
2
February 20, 2020 - 12:58 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

I don’t think it makes all that much sense to talk about “polarized” before the flop, because there aren’t extremely strong or extremely weak hands the way there are on the turn or river. Barring some extreme exploit, any hand you shove here needs decent equity when called. You can’t be jamming Q5o. There may be a a few hands like T9s or something that have decent hold-and-cold equity that play better as calls, but that has more to do with how their equity is distributed across flops than how much equity they have. With hands that are highly dependent on the flop, it may be better to pay a small price to see how good or bad the flop is for you before deciding to commit your stack. But these aren’t “bluff catchers” in the same what that hands in your turn checking range typically are.

3for3
High Stakes Shark
Members
Forum Posts: 201
Member Since:
July 24, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
3
February 21, 2020 - 1:20 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

I didn’t mean extremely weak hands, more like AWs or the like.  Not great to call with, but decent equity when called.  Or, should we be just raising big Aces/Pairs, etc?

Foucault

TPE Pro
Members
Forum Posts: 2067
Member Since:
December 6, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
4
February 21, 2020 - 8:38 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

That’s my point though, a hand like A5s is actually quite strong. Your shoving range isn’t strictly linear in that you may shove some hands that are less strong than some of your calling hands, but you’re still shoving only reasonably strong hands.

3for3
High Stakes Shark
Members
Forum Posts: 201
Member Since:
July 24, 2018
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
5
February 21, 2020 - 10:55 am
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

Ok, we were saying similar things in a different manner.  Post flop there are hands that have extremely poor equity, so your ‘poles’ are wide.

Preflop, obviously all hands have some equity, and they are mostly closer together.  

My main question was ‘do you have hands in between that are calls’, and hands that are pure value shoves, and semi bluff shoves.

I consider the AWs stuff to be a good semi bluff shove; we have modest equity vs calling ranges and sufficient FE to make them profitable.  Of course, our biggest hands are pure value; we hope to get called.  There are hands that are ‘in between’, where we are good enough to call, but do not play well as shoves.

That was what I was trying to get to..

jjpregler
Grinding Micros
Members
Forum Posts: 70
Member Since:
September 29, 2012
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
6
March 1, 2020 - 12:31 pm
sp_Permalink sp_Print
0

I understand what Andrew means, but I also understand the meaning in your question, even if not worded in a specifically correct way.  

You can have 2 possibilities here: 1) Shove the strongest hands in your range, call the middle portion of your range and shove the best hands that cannot profitably call; or 2) Shove or fold here with no calling range.  

(There are more than these 2 options here as exploitative adjustments, but if we are discussing purely mathematically balanced ranges, this is how I view it.)  (Also, I’m sure solvers will spit out more complicated split ranges but they are hard for humans to develop on the spot without lots of study time with solvers.)

The answer really lies in whether you can have a call range here.  And that does depend on the 2 limpers, since you are not closing the action.  Are they straight forward limpers, where they would have already raised their strongest hands and will either only call or fold.  Or are they tricky limpers and will back-raise if you call.  In today’s game, many of the loose limpers tend to be more of the straight forward kind of limper.  And if that is the case, I think you can have a middle calling range.  Which would mean shoving the top of your range and then the best hands that cannot profitably call here to balance the shoving range.  

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 2780

Currently Online:
26 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

bennymacca: 2616

Foucault: 2067

folding_aces_pre_yo: 1133

praetor: 1033

theginger45: 924

P-aire 146: 832

Turbulence: 768

The Riceman: 731

duggs: 591

florianm1: 588

Newest Members:

alexalex2015

oneout2many

JLPicard

Jackarmi

WSOPstar2B

LuckyEva

Forum Stats:

Groups: 4

Forums: 24

Topics: 12705

Posts: 75003

 

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1063

Members: 11988

Moderators: 2

Admins: 5

Administrators: RonFezBuddy, Killingbird, Tournament Poker Edge Staff, ttwist, Carlos

Moderators: sitelock, sitelock_1